Ann Lab Med 2018; 38(4): 331-337
Usefulness of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis, Glycosylation Isomer of Mac-2 Binding Protein, Galectin-3, and Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity 2 for Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Liver Diseases
Hee-Won Moon, M.D.1, Mikyoung Park, M.D.1, Mina Hur, M.D.1, Hanah Kim, M.D.1, Won Hyeok Choe, M.D.2, and Yeo-Min Yun, M.D.1
Departments of Laboratory Medicine1 and Internal Medicine2, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Corresponding author: Mina Hur
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05030, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2030-5581
Fax: +82-2-2636-6764
Received: August 9, 2017; Revised: November 14, 2017; Accepted: January 29, 2018; Published online: July 1, 2018.
© Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. All rights reserved.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background: Liver biopsies have been partially replaced by noninvasive methods for assessing liver fibrosis. We explored the usefulness of four novel biomarkers, enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF), glycosylation isomer of Mac-2 binding protein (M2BPGi), galectin-3, and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), in association with liver fibrosis.
Methods: ELF, M2BPGi, galectin-3, and sST2 were assayed in 173 patients with chronic liver diseases. The results were analyzed according to fibrosis grade (F0/1, F2, and F3/4) by transient elastography (TE).
Results: ELF, M2BPGi, galectin-3, and sST2 values differed significantly according to TE grade; ELF and M2BPGi values were higher in F2 and F3/4 than in F0/1 (P ≤0.001, all), sST2 values were higher in F3/4 than in F0/1 and F2 (P <0.05), and galectin-3 values were higher in F3/4 than in F0/1 (P =0.0036). ELF and M2BPGi showed good TE fibrosis detection performance (area under the curves [AUC], 0.841 and 0.833 for ≥F2; and 0.837 and 0.808 for ≥F3). The sensitivity and specificity for predicting TE grade F≥2 were 84.1% and 76.7% for ELF and 63.6% and 91.5% for M2BPGi.
Conclusions: This is the first study to compare the liver fibrosis assessment of four novel biomarkers: ELF, M2BPGi, galectin-3, and sST2. The biomarkers varied significantly according to TE grade, and each biomarker showed a different trend. ELF and M2BPGi seem to have comparable good performance for detecting liver fibrosis.
Keywords: Liver fibrosis, Biomarker, ELF, M2BPGi, Galectin-3, sST2

This Article



Indexed/Covered by