Serum Copeptin Levels Predict Clinical Outcomes After Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
2018; 38(6): 538-544
Ann Lab Med 2016; 36(4): 313-319
Published online July 1, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2016.36.4.313
Copyright © Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine.
Olga Barbarash, M.D.1, Olga Gruzdeva, M.D.1, Evgenya Uchasova, Ph.D.1, Yulia Dyleva, Ph.D.1, Ekaterina Belik, M.S.1, Olga Akbasheva, M.D.2, Victoria Karetnikova, M.D.1, and Aleksandr Shilov, Ph.D.
Federal State Budgetary Institution1, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Disease, Kemerovo; State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education2, Siberian State Medical University of the Russian Federation Ministry of Health, Tomsk, Russian Federation
Correspondence to: Evgenya Uchasova
Federal State Budgetary Institution, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Disease, Laboratory of Research Homeostasis, 6 Sosnovy Bvld, Kemerovo 650002, Russian Federation
Tel: +7-3842-64-05-53
Fax: +7-3842-64-34-10
E-mail: evg.uchasova@yandex.ru
Background: Studying the role of soluble ST2 (sST2) during hospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI) can be helpful for predicting the course of the hospitalization and development of complications. Methods: We included 88 patients with MI (median age, 58 yr). Depending on the course of the hospitalization, the patients were divided into two groups: the favorable (n=58) and unfavorable (n=30) outcome groups. On days 1 and 12 after MI, serum sST2 and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were measured by ELISA. Results: On day 1, the concentrations of sST2 and NT-proBNP increased 2.4- and 4.5-fold, compared with the controls. Measurements on day 12 showed a significant decrease in the sST2 level (P=0.001), whereas the NT-proBNP level did not change. On day 1, the sST2 level in the unfavorable outcome group was 2-fold higher than that in the favorable outcome group and 3.7-fold higher than in the controls. On day 12, the marker level decreased in both groups. On day 1, the NT-proBNP level in the unfavorable outcome group was 6.8-fold higher than in the controls and 1.8-fold higher than in the favorable outcome group. On day 12, the level of NT-proBNP remained elevated in both groups. Determining the levels of both sST2 and NT-proBNP increases their diagnostic significance (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-3.2; areas under curve [AUC] 0.89; P=0.004). Conclusions: The level of sST2 is a more sensitive indicator during MI hospitalization than NT-proBNP.
Keywords: Myocardial infarction, NT-proBNP, sST2