Serotype Distribution and Antimicrobial Resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae Causing Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in Korea Between 2017 and 2019 After Introduction of the 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine
2023; 43(1): 45-54
Ann Lab Med 2022; 42(2): 268-273
Published online March 1, 2022 https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2022.42.2.268
Copyright © Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine.
Si Hyun Kim , Ph.D.1,*, Gyung-Hye Sung , Ph.D.2,*, Eun Hee Park , Ph.D.2, In Yeong Hwang , Ph.D.2, Gyu Ri Kim , Ph.D.3, Sae Am Song , M.D.3, Hae Kyung Lee , M.D.4, Young Uh , M.D.5, Young Ah Kim , M.D.6, Seok Hoon Jeong , M.D.7, Jong Hee Shin , M.D.8, Kyeong Seob Shin , M.D.9, Jaehyeon Lee , M.D.10, Joseph Jeong , M.D.11, Young Ree Kim , M.D.12, Dongeun Yong , M.D.13, Miae Lee , M.D.14, Yu Kyung Kim , M.D.15, Nam Hee Ryoo , M.D.16, Seungok Lee , M.D.17, Jayoung Kim , M.D.18, Sunjoo Kim , M.D.19, Hyun Soo Kim , M.D.20, and Jeong Hwan Shin, M.D.3,21
1Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Semyung University, Jecheon, Korea; 2Busan Institute of Health and Environment, Busan, Korea; 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea; 4Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea; 5Department of Laboratory Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea; 6Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea; 7Department of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; 8Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea; 9Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea; 10Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea; 11Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea; 12Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea; 13Department of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; 14Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; 15Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea; 16Department of Laboratory Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea; 17Department of Laboratory Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea; 18Department of Laboratory Medicine, International St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea; 19Department of Laboratory Medicine, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Korea; 20Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea; 21Paik Institute for Clinical Research, Inje University, Busan, Korea
Correspondence to: Jeong Hwan Shin, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, 75 Bokji-ro, Busanjin-gu, Busan 47392, Korea
Tel: +82-51-890-6475
Fax: +82-51-893-1562
E-mail: jhsmile@paik.ac.kr
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Salmonella is one of the major causes of food-borne infections. We investigated the serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates collected in Korea between January 2016 and December 2017. In total, 669 Salmonella isolates were collected from clinical specimens at 19 university hospitals. Serotyping was performed according to the Kauffmann–White scheme, and antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using Sensititre EUVSEC plates or disk diffusion. Among the strains, C (39.8%) and B (36.6%) were the most prevalent serogroups. In total, 51 serotypes were identified, and common serotypes were S. enterica serovar I 4,[5],12:i:- (16.7%), S. Enteritidis (16.1%), S. Bareilly (14.6%), S. Typhimurium (9.9%), and S. Infantis (6.9%). The resistance rates to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were 32.6%, 12.1%, and 8.4%, respectively. The resistance rates to cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin were 8.1% and 3.0%, respectively, while 5.4% were multidrug-resistant. S. enterica serovar I 4,[5],12:i:- and S. Enteritidis were highly prevalent, and there was an increase in rare serotypes. Multidrug resistance and ciprofloxacin resistance were highly prevalent. Periodic investigations of Salmonella serotypes and antimicrobial resistance are needed.
Keywords: Serotyping, Antimicrobial resistance, Salmonella
Ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) are no longer used as primary antimicrobials because of the high resistance rates to these agents [7]. Third-generation cephalosporin and fluoroquinolone are recommended as first-line antimicrobials; however, there have been several reports of resistance [8, 9]. We investigated the serotype distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of
In total, 669
Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using Sensititre EUVSEC susceptibility MIC plates (TREK Diagnostic Systems/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cleveland, OH, USA). The antimicrobials tested were ampicillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, imipenem, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and azithromycin. SXT susceptibility was determined using disk diffusion (discs from Becton, Dickinson and Company).
Serogroup C (N=266; 39.8%) was the most common followed by B (N=245; 36.6%), D (N=135; 20.2%), G (N=6; 0.9%), A (N=4; 0.6%), E (N=4; 0.6%), K (N=3; 0.4%), M (N=3; 0.4%), I (N=1; 0.1%), X (N=1; 0.1%), and Y (N=1; 0.1%).
In total, 51 serotypes were identified. The most common serotype was
Table 1 . Serogroup and serotype distributions of
Serogroup A | Serogroup C | Serogroup E | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Serotype | N (%) | Serotype | N (%) | Serotype | N (%) | ||
Paratyphi A | 4 (0.6%) | Bareilly | 98 (14.6) | Amager var 15+* | 2 (0.3) | ||
Serogroup B | Infantis | 46 (6.9) | London | 1 (0.1) | |||
Serotype | N (%) | Thompson | 23 (3.4) | Senftenberg | 1 (0.1) | ||
I4,[5],12:i:- | 112 (16.7) | Livingstone | 18 (2.7) | Serogroup G | |||
Typhimurium | 66 (9.9) | Virchow | 14 (2.1) | Serotype | N (%) | ||
Agona | 23 (3.4) | Othmarschen | 11 (1.6) | Telelkebir* | 3 (0.4) | ||
Saintpaul | 13 (1.9) | Mbandaka | 10 (1.5) | Agbeni* | 1 (0.1) | ||
Schleissheim | 7 (1.0) | Rissen | 9 (1.3) | NewYork* | 1 (0.1) | ||
Schwarzengrund | 6 (0.9) | II 6,7:g,[m],s,t:(z42) | 6 (0.9) | Poona | 1 (0.1) | ||
Stanley | 6 (0.9) | Newport | 6 (0.9) | Serogroup I | |||
SanDiego | 4 (0.6) | Braenderup | 4 (0.6) | Serotype | N (%) | ||
Derby | 3 (0.4) | Narashino | 4 (0.6) | Naware* | 1 (0.1) | ||
Heidelberg | 2 (0.3) | Albany | 3 (0.4) | Serogroup K | |||
Coeln | 1 (0.1) | Montevideo | 3 (0.4) | Serotype | N (%) | ||
Kaapstad* | 1 (0.1) | Corvallis | 2 (0.3) | Cerro* | 3 (0.4) | ||
Lagos | 1 (0.1) | Goldcoast | 2 (0.3) | Serogroup M | |||
Serogroup D | Kentucky | 2 (0.3) | Serotype | N (%) | |||
Serotype | N (%) | Litchfield | 2 (0.3) | Pomona | 2 (0.3) | ||
Enteritidis | 108 (16.1) | IV 6,7:z4 z23:-* | 1 (0.1) | Umbilo* | 1 (0.1) | ||
Typhi | 20 (3.0) | Ferruch* | 1 (0.1) | Serogroup X | |||
Panama | 7 (1.0) | Ohio | 1 (0.1) | Serotype | N (%) | ||
IIIb 47:r:z* | 1 (0.1) | ||||||
Serogroup Y | |||||||
Serotype | N (%) | ||||||
IIIb 48:k:z* | 1 (0.1) |
*Rare
Table 2 lists the resistance rates of the
Table 2 . Antimicrobial resistance rates according to
Serotype | N | AMP | CTX | CAZ | CHL | IMI | GEN | TET | CIP | AZI | SXT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I 4,[5],12:i:- | 112 | 102 (91.1) | 16 (14.3) | 5 (4.5) | 26 (23.2) | 0 (0) | 11 (9.8) | 96 (85.7) | 7 (6.3) | 1 (0.9) | 22 (19.6) |
Enteritidis | 108 | 48 (44.4) | 23 (21.3) | 22 (20.4) | 27 (25.0) | 0 (0) | 18 (16.7) | 27 (25.0) | 2 (1.9) | 1 (0.9) | 8 (7.4) |
Bareilly | 98 | 2 (2.0) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (1.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (2.0) | 2 (2.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Typhimurium | 66 | 35 (53.0) | 2 (3.0) | 2 (3.0) | 12 (18.2) | 0 (0) | 20 (30.3) | 31 (47.0) | 2 (3.0) | 1 (1.5) | 9 (13.6) |
Infantis | 46 | 1 (2.2) | 1 (2.2) | 1 (2.2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Agona | 23 | 1 (4.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (4.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (4.3) |
Thompson | 23 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Typhi | 20 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (5.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (15.0) | 5 (25.0) | 3 (15.0) | 0 (0) |
Others* | 173 | 29 (16.8) | 11 (6.4) | 9 (5.2) | 14 (8.1) | 0 (0) | 7 (4.0) | 28 (16.2) | 4 (2.3) | 3 (1.7) | 16 (9.2) |
Total | 669 | 218 (32.6) | 54 (8.1) | 40 (6.0) | 81 (12.1) | 0 (0) | 58 (8.7) | 187 (28.0) | 20 (3.0) | 9 (1.3) | 56 (8.4) |
*Livingstone, Virchow, Saintpaul, Othmarschen, Mbandaka, Rissen, Panama, Schleissheim, II 6,7:g,[m],s,t:(z42), Newport, Schwarzengrund, Stanley, Braenderup, Narashino, Paratyphi A, SanDiego, Albany, Cerro, Derby, Montevideo, Telelkebir, Amager var 15+, Corvallis, Goldcoast, Heidelberg, Kentucky, Litchfield, Pomona, IIIb 47:r:z, IIIb 48:k:z, IV 6,7:z4 z23:-, Agbeni, Coeln, Ferruch, Kaapstad, Lagos, London, Naware, NewYork, Ohio, Poona, Senftenberg, Umbilo.
Abbreviations: AMP, ampicillin; CTX, cefotaxime; CAZ, ceftazidime; CHL, chloramphenicol; IMI, imipenem; GEN, gentamicin; TET, tetracycline; CIP, ciprofloxacin; AZI, azithromycin; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
The resistance rate differed depending on the serotype.
Of the 669 isolates, 5.4% (N=36) exhibited MDR. The distribution of MDR serotypes was
We found 12 rare serotypes that have not been previously reported as a cause of human infections in Korea. Outbreaks of food-borne diseases transmitted by livestock have been commonly reported in other countries [18, 19]. We assume that these serotypes originated from imported foods or foreign travel, although we did not confirm the origin of the infections. Thus, continued investigation of serotype changes and the emergence of new serotypes is required.
A report of the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System revealed decreased susceptibilities to ciprofloxacin and azithromycin in 2015, although the resistance rates of NTS were <0.4% [20]. In our previous study, we found no
MDR
In conclusion,
None.
Kim SH and Sung G-H study design, data analysis and writing original draft; Park EH, Hwang IY, and Kim GR experiments and data management; Song SA, Lee HK, Uh Y, Kim YA, Jeong SH, Shin JH, Shin KS, Lee J, Jeong J, Kim YR, Yong D, Lee M, Kim YK, Ryoo NH, Lee S, Kim J, Kim S, and Kim HS collection of strains and valuable review; Shin JH study design, writing review and editing; All authors review and approval of manuscript.
None declared.
This research was supported by a fund by Research of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017E4400100) and a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea (grant number: HR21-C1003).