Clinical Significance of Serum Procalcitonin in Patients with Community-acquired Lobar Pneumonia
2010; 30(4): 406-413
Ann Lab Med 2013; 33(2): 105-110
Published online March 1, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2013.33.2.105
Copyright © Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine.
Neul-Bom Yoon, M.D., Choonhee Son, Ph.D., and Soo-Jung Um, M.D.
Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Dong-A University Medical Center, Busan, Korea
Correspondence to: Soo-Jung Um
Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Dong-A University Medical Center, 26 Daesingongwon-ro, Seo-gu, Busan 602-715, Korea
Tel: +82-51-240-2769
Fax: +82-51-242-5852
E-mail: sjum@dau.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background: Differential diagnosis between pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and bacterial community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is often challenging. The neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLR), a convenient marker of inflammation, has been demonstrated to be a useful biomarker for predicting bacteremia. We investigated the usefulness of the NLR for discriminating pulmonary TB from bacterial CAP in an intermediate TB-burden country. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and laboratory characteristics of 206 patients suspected of having pulmonary TB or bacterial CAP from January 2009 to February 2011. The diagnostic ability of the NLR for differential diagnosis was evaluated and compared with that of C-reactive protein. Results: Serum NLR levels were significantly lower in patients with pulmonary TB than in patients with bacterial CAP (3.67±2.12 vs. 14.64±9.72, P <0.001). A NLR <7 was an optimal cut-off value to discriminate patients with pulmonary TB from patients with bacterial CAP (sensitivity 91.1%, specificity 81.9%, positive predictive value 85.7%, negative predictive value 88.5%). The area under the curve for the NLR (0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.98) was significantly greater than that of C-reactive protein (0.83, 95% CI, 0.76- 0.88; P =0.0015). Conclusions: The NLR obtained at the initial diagnostic stage is a useful laboratory marker to discriminate patients with pulmonary TB from patients with bacterial CAP in an intermediate TB-burden country.
Keywords: C-reactive protein, Lymphocyte, Neutrophil, Pneumonia, Tuberculosis