Clinical Pharmacogenetic Testing and Application: 2024 Updated Guidelines by the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
2025; 45(2): 121-132
Ann Lab Med 2016; 36(2): 154-161
Published online March 1, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2016.36.2.154
Copyright © Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine.
Mi-Kyung Lee, M.D.1, Sinyoung Kim, M.D.2, Mi-Na Kim, M.D.3, Oh Joo Kweon, M.D.1, Yong Kwan Lim, M.D.1, Chang-Seok Ki, M.D.4, Jae-Seok Kim, M.D.5, Moon-Woo Seong, M.D.6, Heungsup Sung, M.D.4, Dongeun Yong, M.D.2, Hyukmin Lee, M.D.7, Jong-Rak Choi, M.D.2, Jeong-Ho Kim, M.D.2; MERS-CoV Laboratory Response Task Force of The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
Department of Laboratory Medicine1, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul; Department of Laboratory Medicine2, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul; Department of Laboratory Medicine3, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics4, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul; Department of Laboratory Medicine5, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul; Department of Laboratory Medicine6, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul; Department of Laboratory Medicine7, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
Correspondence to: Jeong-Ho Kim
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2228-2448
Fax: +82-2-364-1583
E-mail: jeongho@yuhs.ac
Background: It is crucial to understand the current status of clinical laboratory practices for the largest outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infections in the Republic of Korea to be well prepared for future emerging infectious diseases.
Methods: We conducted a survey of 49 clinical laboratories in medical institutions and referral medical laboratories. A short questionnaire to survey clinical laboratory practices relating to MERS-CoV diagnostic testing was sent by email to the directors and clinical pathologists in charge of the clinical laboratories performing MERS-CoV testing. The survey focused on testing volume, reporting of results, resources, and laboratory safety.
Results: A total of 40 clinical laboratories responded to the survey. A total of 27,009 MERS-CoV real-time reverse transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) tests were performed. Most of the specimens were sputum (73.5%). The median turnaround time (TAT) was 5.29 hr (first and third quartile, 4.11 and 7.48 hr) in 26 medical institutions. The median TAT of more than a half of the laboratories (57.7%) was less than 6 hr. Many laboratories were able to perform tests throughout the whole week. Laboratory biosafety preparedness included class II biosafety cabinets (100%); separated pre-PCR, PCR, and post-PCR rooms (88.6%); negative pressure pretreatment rooms (48.6%); and negative pressure sputum collection rooms (20.0%).
Conclusions: Clinical laboratories were able to quickly expand their diagnostic capacity in response to the 2015 MERS-CoV outbreak. Our results show that clinical laboratories play an important role in the maintenance and enhancement of laboratory response in preparation for future emerging infections.
Keywords: Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), Korea, Outbreak, Clinical laboratory, Preparedness, Survey