Original Article

Ann Lab Med 2019; 39(3): 237-244

Published online May 1, 2019

Copyright © Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine.

Accurate and Rapid Measurement of Glycated Hemoglobin Using HLC-723 G11 Variant Mode

Min-Seung Park, M.D.1, Kyunghoon Lee, M.D.2, Kyunghoon Lee, M.D.3, Junghan Song, M.D., Ph.D.3, and Hyung-Doo Park , M.D., Ph.D.1

1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea

Correspondence to: Hyung-Doo Park, M.D.
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3410-0290
Fax: +82-2-3410-2719

Received: February 27, 2018; Revised: July 3, 2019; Accepted: December 11, 2018

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Type II diabetes mellitus causes many complications, and its prevalence continues to increase in Korea. Accurate measurement of glycated Hb (HbA1c) is important because of its usefulness in diagnosis, follow-up, and prediction of prognosis. We tested the analytical performance of the HLC-723 G11 Variant Mode (G11vr; Tosoh Bioscience, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), recently introduced to Korea, in detecting HbA1c.


We evaluated precision, linearity, carry-over, and turnaround time. Using 208 samples, including 108 flagged samples, we compared HbA1c concentrations from four analyzers through correlation analysis: G11vr, HLC-723 G8 Variant Mode (G8vr, Tosoh Bioscience), HLC-723 G11 Standard Mode (G11st, Tosoh Bioscience), and HLC-723 G8 Standard Mode (G8st, Tosoh Bioscience). We used HPLC mass spectrometry (MS) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) to confirm the HbA1c concentrations of 15 additional known Hb variant samples.


Repeatability (% CV) in measuring low- and high-concentration controls was 0.57% and 0.35%, respectively; within-laboratory precision was 0.86% and 0.69%, respectively. In a linearity test, the coefficient of determination was 0.9999 (measurement range: 3.64% to 18.59%) for HbA1c. The correlations between G11vr and other analyzers were weaker for flagged samples than for non-flagged samples. The carry-over effect was less than 0.4%. Turnaround time for a single sample was lower in G11vr (one minute) than in G8vr (1.6 minutes). For 15 samples with Hb variants, G11vr HbA1c results were more similar than those of other analyzers to HPLC-MS and CE results.


G11vr showed adequate performance and rapid turnaround time in measuring HbA1c.

Keywords: HbA1c, Hb variants, Glycated Hb, Tosoh HLC-723 G11 analyzer, Performance

Diabetes can lead to many complications in the long term, including retinopathy, neuropathy, and renal diseases [1]. According to the Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey 2016, 15.8% of men and 13.0% of women aged 30 years or older were diagnosed as having diabetes [2]. Diabetes mellitus is diagnosed based on symptoms, fasting plasma glucose concentration, oral glucose tolerance test, and glycated Hb (HbA1c) measurement. Among these, HbA1c reflects blood glucose status over the three prior months and is widely used because it plays an important role in predicting the prognosis of the therapeutic effect as well as in diagnosis and follow-up [3,4]. As HbA1c test results have become more important and the demand for the test has increased, fast and accurate reporting of HbA1c test results has become one of the main challenges. HbA1c can be measured by several methods: ion-exchange HPLC, boronate affinity HPLC, enzymatic assay, immunoassay, or electrophoresis [5]. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) reference methods for measuring HbA1c concentration are HPLC-mass spectrometry (MS) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) [5], but the use of these assays is limited because of cost-effectiveness issues and turnaround time. Many Korean laboratories preferentially use HPLC to measure HbA1c concentration because of its stability and the possibility to directly identify Hb variants from the chromatogram. According to the quality assurance program in Korea, about 75% of laboratories employed HPLC in 2014 [6]. Accurate HPLC-based measurement of HbA1c concentration may be difficult in patients with Hb variants, when an abnormal chromatogram is present.

Recently, substantial efforts have been made to measure HbA1c concentrations that are corrected for Hb variants; for example, some studies have used HPLC methods excluding the fraction of Hb variants [7,8]. The HLC-723 G8 HbA1c analyzer (Tosoh Bioscience, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) has two versions, Variant Mode (G8vr) and Standard Mode (G8st). In the G8vr, Hb variants are detected, but the turnaround time is long, whereas in the G8st, the turnaround time is short, but Hb variants may go undetected. We evaluated the basic performance of the HLC-723 G11 Variant Mode (G11vr; Tosoh Bioscience), recently introduced in Korea, which is based on the ion-exchange HPLC method, and evaluated its usefulness for HbA1c assays in the case of Hb variants.


We evaluated the basic performance of the G11vr. For correlation evaluation, we used G8vr, HLC-723 G11 Standard Mode (G11st, Tosoh Bioscience) and G8st. For comparison with the discordant results between G11vr and G8vr, we used the Cobas Integra 800 immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). For comparison with the reference method, HPLC-MS, we used liquid chromatography (Shimadzu Nexera X2 UPLC; Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan) and MS (AB Sciex 6500 Triple Quad, AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). CE was performed using a Sebia Capillarys 2 Flex Piercing Hemoglobin(E) kit (Sebia, Lisse, France).

Sample collection

This study was conducted at Samsung Medical Center, a tertiary-care hospital in Seoul, Korea, and was approved by its Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 2016-12-134). Regardless of age, sex, and underlying diseases, samples submitted for routine HbA1c test between Dec 2016 to May 2017 were included in this study for method comparison. Each sample was stored at −70℃ until analysis.

A total of 208 samples were collected, and samples were divided into two groups using the G8vr: 108 flagged and 100 non-flagged samples. Flags indicate unusual chromatogram patterns, including low total chromatogram area, low HbA1c concentrations (<4%), high HbF concentrations (≥5%), abnormal peaks in the HbA1c fraction, the presence of unknown peaks, peaks not detected, and peaks with the possible presence of Hb variants. Of the 108 flagged samples, 52 had flags associated with abnormal peaks in the HbA1c fraction, the presence of unknown peaks, or peaks related to the possible presence of Hb variants. In addition, 15 samples with known Hb variants were provided by Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea, to confirm the HbA1c concentrations by HPLC-MS.


Precision was assessed using high- and low-concentration quality control substances for HbA1c, which were provided by the manufacturer, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP05-A3 guidelines [9]. Repeatability and within-laboratory precision values (% CV) were assessed twice daily for 20 days at both low and high concentrations. Each test value was determined as the mean value of the two measurements.


Linearity was evaluated according to the CLSI EP06-A guidelines [10]. High- and low-concentration control materials that were close to the upper and lower limits of the measurement range (18.59% and 3.64%, respectively) were used. Linearity was evaluated at mixture ratios of 4:0, 3:1, 2:2, 1:3, and 0:4. The test was repeated four times for each of the five concentrations, and linearity was evaluated on the basis of the coefficient of determination (R2).


The comparison study was conducted according to the CLSI EP09-A3 guidelines [11]. For each of the 108 flagged and 100 non-flagged samples, we compared the G11vr with G8vr, G11st, and G8st, by calculating correlation coefficients (r) and the percentage difference between the results of the respective analyzers.

To evaluate HbA1c measurement in the presence of Hb variants, the 15 samples with known Hb variants were measured with each analyzer. We also measured HbA1c concentrations using both HPLC-MS and CE in these 15 samples.

Turnaround time

We recorded the time required to test one sample, 10 samples, and 30 samples, for the G11vr, G8vr, G11st, and G8st. Turnaround time means the testing time from mounting the samples to reporting the results. No flagged sample was included in this analysis.

Carry-over effect

To evaluate the carry-over effect for the G11vr, low- and high-concentration patient samples were selected and were measured four times, starting with the high-concentration samples (16.0%, H1–H4). After measuring the low-concentration samples four times (4.6%, L1–L4), the carry-over ratio was calculated using the following equation:

carry-over ratio=[{L1−(L3+L4)/2}/{(H2+H3)/2−(L3+L4)/2}]×100

Statistical analysis

We used MedCalc (version 11.5, MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium) and R ver. 3.5.1 for statistical analysis. We also drew box-and-whiskers plots to show medians and interquartile ranges for the differences between each analyzer and HPLC-MS results of the 15 additional samples. Each P value was calculated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. P<0.05 was considered significant.


Repeatability (% CV) in measuring low- and high-concentration controls was 0.57% and 0.35%, respectively. Within-laboratory precision was 0.86% and 0.69%, respectively.


R2 was 0.9999 for the measurement range of 3.64% to 18.59% for HbA1c. The relationship between the expected value and the measured value at each concentration was described by the following equation:



Fig. 1 shows the correlations between analyzers for flagged and non-flagged samples. When we used immunoassays to reanalyze the six samples (A-1 to A-6) with the most discordant results between G11vr and G8vr (% difference >30%), the G11vr results were more similar to those of the immunoassay than to those of the G8vr (Table 1).

HbA1c concentrations for eight of the 15 additional samples (B-1 to B-15) were higher when measured with G11vr than with the other analyzers (Table 2). The differences in HbA1c results between G11vr and HPLC-MS were significantly smaller than the differences between the other analyzers and HPLC-MS (Fig. 2). The HbA1c results of HPLC-MS and CE were similar. Three representative chromatograms of the 15 additional samples are shown in Fig. 3.

Turnaround time

Turnaround times for each analyzer are presented in Fig. 4.

Carry-over effect

The carry-over effect between high- and low-concentrations of HbA1c measured on the G11vr was 0.39%.

Differences in results between methods can be due to interfering factors (e.g., bilirubin, triglyceride, cholesterol, and drugs) or variation related to the measurement of HbA1c concentration in the presence of other members of the Hb family (HbF, Hb variants) [12]. The usefulness of ion-exchange HPLC for measuring HbA1c concentration in the presence of Hb variants is limited [13]. We focused on the ability of the G11vr to measure Hb variants as well as its basic performance. The repeatability and within-laboratory precision of this analyzer were excellent, within 1%, at both high and low concentrations. The linearity of R2 was also excellent; it was as high as 0.9999. Regarding the comparison test, the correlations between analyzers were weaker for flagged samples than for non-flagged samples (the latter having r values over 0.997). Of the flagged samples, the six with the greatest differences between G11vr and G8vr were all with flags indicating potential Hb variants by G11vr. When we re-analyzed the samples by immunoassay, the results were similar to those of G11vr.

HPLC analyzers have the advantages of great precision and a visually identifiable chromatogram, but the disadvantage of interference by various hemoglobinopathies, HbF, and carbamylated Hb. An advantage of immunoassays is that they are not affected by HbE, HbD, or carbamylated Hb; however, they can be affected by hemoglobinopathies with altered amino acids on binding sites or by HbF [14]. To compare the influence of Hb variants, we measured HbA1c concentrations in 15 samples with known Hb variants. HbA1c concentrations on G11vr were more similar than those of other analyzers to HbA1c concentrations measured using HPLC-MS or CE. The seven samples for which Hb concentrations were higher in G11vr than in G8vr all contained Hb G-Coushatta variants. This variant is most commonly found in Koreans [15], and samples with Hb G-Coushatta show significant negative bias on G8vr [16]. The differences between the G11vr and G8vr results can be explained by the fact that the G11vr separates the abnormal peak better (Fig. 3) and that HbA1c concentration was calculated after excluding the variant peak area. G11 is an upgrade of G8—the software was upgraded from v. 5.24 to v. 3.01—in which the issue of interference with HbE is reduced. The Hb G-Coushatta peak is eluted at a similar retention time as that of HbE in HPLC analyzers, and reduced interference with Hb G-Coushatta on G11vr was expected. Thus, G11vr seems to reduce the probability of misdiagnosis of diabetes because there is no negative bias against Hb G-Coushatta.

The performance of HPLC analyzers in the presence of interference by unusual Hb variants (Hb Yamagata, Hb G-Hi's-Tsou, etc.) needs to be further investigated. When comparing G11vr and G11st, G11vr tended to produce higher concentrations, and most of the results that showed similar values between the G11vr and the G11st were detected with flags unrelated to Hb variants (HbA1c <4%, Hb-F ≥5%, low total area). Most of the samples that showed a higher value on G11vr than on G11st were those, in which G11vr detected Hb variants, whereas G11st did not. The fact that some samples have higher HbA1c concentrations on G11vr than on G8vr, along with the better correlation with immunoassay and HPLC-MS, suggests that the G11vr provides more accurate HbA1c results than the G8vr in the presence of Hb variants. Thus, we expect that use of G11vr will improve the diagnosis of diabetes in patients with Hb variants.

With regard to turnaround time of the four analyzers, when the sample preparation time (two minutes) was not taken into account, G11vr required less time than G8vr to test one sample (1 vs 1.6 minutes) but the same as that for G8st, which is widely used in Korea. G11st is twice as fast as G11vr. Variant analyzers that are currently used are disadvantageous compared with standard analyzers; thus, standard analyzers have been the mainstay in many Korean laboratories. We showed that the turnaround time for G11vr is similar to that for the existing G8st, and thus, G11vr seems to overcome this limitation.

In the past year at our hospital, reported HbA1c concentrations were lower in patients with Hb variants. Hence, we replaced all HbA1c analyzers with G8vr to improve Hb variant detection; since the replacement, a considerable number of patients with Hb variants have been identified. Until recently, Hb variants were thought to be uncommon in Koreans and thus, we did not consider it necessary to detect Hb variants and correct HbA1c concentrations. However, as more than two million foreigners reside in Korea, [17] Hb variants are expected to be observed at increasing concentrations, and a variant-mode HPLC analyzer would be a requisite for accurate measurement of HbA1c concentrations in foreigners. Although the reference interval of HbA1c is 4–6% as suggested by the manufacturer, testing the recent American Diabetes Association (ADA) cut-offs for diagnosis of diabetes and for risk assessment of vascular complications would be useful [18].

A limitation of this study is that we described the HbA1c concentration unit as a percentage, as is currently in use, and did not convert values into SI units (mmol/mol) as per IFCC, which is globally recommended. There are several reasons for using the percentage. In Korea, most laboratories report HbA1c in %, and clinicians also use % as a common unit, according to the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program. Raw data from the G11vr is also displayed in % (Fig. 3), and the recent College of American Pathologists (CAP) survey also reported % as the HbA1c unit. Since there are still many documents primarily using % as the HbA1c concentration unit [19,20,21,22,23], we decided to report HbA1c concentration as %.

In conclusion, G11vr showed excellent precision and linearity, and minimal carry-over effect in HbA1c measurement, as well as fast turnaround time. G11vr would be clinically useful, as it has the advantages of detecting Hb variants and correcting HbA1c measurements to values consistent with the immunoassay, HPLC-MS, and CE results, compared with existing standard analyzers.

Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest: No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Fig. 1.

Correlations and difference plots of HbA1c measurements between different analyzers. (A) G11vr vs G8vr in samples without flags, (B) G11vr vs G11st in samples without flags, (C) G11vr vs G8st in samples without flags, (D) G11vr vs G8vr in samples with flags, (E) G11vr vs G11st in samples with flags, (F) G11vr vs G8st in samples with flags.

Abbreviations: G11vr, HLC-723 G11 Variant Mode (Tosoh Bioscience, Inc., Tokyo, Japan); G8vr, HLC-723 G8 Variant Mode (Tosoh Bioscience); G11st, HLC-723 G11 Standard Mode (Tosoh Bioscience); G8st, HLC-723 G8 Standard Mode (Tosoh Bioscience).

Fig. 2.

Box-and-whisker plot of the differences between each analyzer and HPLC-MS HbA1c results for 15 known Hb variants. The central box represents the interquartile range, and the middle line indicates the median (G11vr, 0.2; G8vr, −0.5; G11st, −1.3; G8st, −1.2). A line extends from the minimum to the maximum value, excluding single outlier in G8st, which is displayed as a separate point for G8st.

Abbreviations: G11vr, HLC-723 G11 Variant Mode (Tosoh Bioscience, Inc., Tokyo, Japan); G8vr, HLC-723 G8 Variant Mode (Tosoh Bioscience); G11st, HLC-723 G11 Standard Mode (Tosoh Bioscience); G8st, HLC-723 G8 Standard Mode (Tosoh Bioscience).

Fig. 3.

Chromatograms of the three samples with known Hb-variant. The black part in the chromatogram represents the HbA1c region. (A) Sample B-4 (Hb G-Coushatta): (B) Sample B-8 (Hb G-Coushatta): (C) Sample B-9 (Hb Queens [α]).

Abbreviations: G11vr, HLC-723 G11 Variant Mode (Tosoh Bioscience, Inc., Tokyo, Japan); G8vr, HLC-723 G8 Variant Mode (Tosoh Bioscience).

Fig. 4.

Turnaround times from sample mounting to result reporting. Turnaround times for one sample (A), 10 samples (B), and 30 samples (C) on the different analyzers. No flagged sample was detected.

Abbreviations: G11vr, HLC-723 G11 Variant Mode (Tosoh Bioscience, Inc., Tokyo, Japan); G8vr, HLC-723 G8 Variant Mode (Tosoh Bioscience); G11st, HLC-723 G11 Standard Mode (Tosoh Bioscience); G8st, HLC-723 G8 Standard Mode (Tosoh Bioscience).

Comparison of HbA1c concentrations in six samples with Hb variants

SampleHbA1c concentrations (%)

HbA1c concentrations by HPLC-MS, capillary electrophoresis (CE), and HPLC analyzers

SampleHb variant genotypeHbA1c concentration (%)
B-1Hb Chad (α)
B-2Hb G-Coushatta6.
B-3Hb G-Coushatta5.55.363.93.73.7
B-4Hb G-Coushatta7.
B-5Hb G-Coushatta6.
B-6Hb G-Coushatta7.
B-7Hb G-Coushatta5.
B-8Hb G-Coushatta5.
B-9Hb Queens (α)
B-10Hb Queens (α)
B-11Hb Queens (α)
B-12Hb Queens (α)
B-13Hb Queens (α)
B-14Hb Ube-4 (α)
B-15Hb Ube-4 (α)

  1. Weykamp C. HbA1c: a review of analytical and clinical aspects. Ann Lab Med 2013;33:393-400.
  2. Korea national health and nutritional examination survey 2016 (Updated on Jan 2018).
  3. Kwon SS, Kwon JY, Park YW, Kim YH, Lim JB. HbA1c for diagnosis and prognosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2015;110:38-43.
  4. Nishimura T, Meguro S, Sekioka R, Tanaka K, Saisho Y, Irie J, et al. A reduction of HbA1c after 3 months predicts 2-year responsiveness to sitagliptin treatment. Intern Med 2015;54:2981-2989.
  5. Jeon Y, Han M, Lee K, Chang HE, Park KU, Song J. Performance evaluation of the CAPILLARYS 2 FLEX Piercing Analyzer for HbA1c determination. Lab Med Online 2013;3:221-226.
  6. Chung S, Jun SH, Song WH, Song J. Six years' experience of accuracy-based proficiency testing for HbA1c in Korea. J Lab Med Qual Assur 2015;37:92-100.
  7. Bouzid K, Ahmed HB, Kalai E, Blibeche S, Couque N, Khiari K, et al. Prevalence of hemoglobin variants in a diabetic population at high risk of hemoglobinopathies and optimization of HbA1c monitoring by incorporating HPLC in the laboratory workup. Libyan J Med 2014;9:25768.
  8. Koga M, Kurebayashi S, Murai J, Saito H, Miyazaki A. Degree of discrepancy between HbA1c and glycemia in variant hemoglobin is smaller when HbA1c is measured by new-type Arkray HPLC compared with old-type HPLC. Clin Biochem 2014;47:123-125.
  9. CLSI, Evaluation of precision of quantitative measurement procedures; approved guideline. CLSI EP05-A3. 3rd ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2014.
  10. CLSI, Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative measurement procedures: a statistical approach; approved guideline. CLSI EP06-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2003.
  11. CLSI, Measurement procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guideline. CLSI EP9-A3. 3rd ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2002.
  12. Wu X, Chao Y, Wan Z, Wang Y, Ma Y, Ke P, et al. A comparative evaluation of the analytical performances of Capillarys 2 Flex Piercing, Tosoh HLC-723 G8, Premier Hb9210, and Roche Cobas c501 Tina-quant Gen 2 analyzers for HbA1c determination. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2016;26:353-364.
  13. Nasir NM, Thevarajah M, Yean CY. Hemoglobin variants detected by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) analysis and the effects on HbA1c measurements. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 2010;30:86-90.
  14. World Health Organization, Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: abbreviated report of a WHO consultation, 2011. WHO. Available from: (Updated on Oct 2018).
  15. Yun YM, Ji M, Ko DH, Chun S, Kwon GC, Lee K, et al. Hb variants in Korea: effect on HbA1c using five routine methods. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1234-1242.
  16. Xu A, Chen W, Xia Y, Zhou Y, Ji L. Effects of common hemoglobin variants on HbA1c measurements in China: results for alpha- and beta-globin variants measured by six methods. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1353-1361.
  17. Jisuk Woo, Levinson JD. Diversity, dialogue, and deliberation: an empirical investigation of age, gender, and meaningful decision-making in Korean juries. Asian-Pacific L Policy J 2017;19:1:23-48.
  18. American Diabetes Association. (6) Glycemic targets. Diabetes Care 2015;38:S33-S40.
  19. Bonadonna RC, Yale JF, Brulle-Wohlhueter C, Boëlle-Le Corfec E, Choudhary P, Bailey TS. Hypoglycaemia as a function of HbA1c in type 2 diabetes: Insulin glargine 300 U/mL in a patient-level pooled analysis of EDITION 1, 2 and 3. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018.
  20. Doggui R, Abdelhafidh Sahli C, Aissa WL, Hammami M, Ben Sedrine M, Mahjoub R, et al. Capillarys 2 Flex Piercing: analytical performance assessment according to CLSI protocols for HbA1c quantification. Electrophoresis 2017;38:2210-2218.
  21. Müller-Wieland D, Merkel M, Hamann A, Siegel E, Ottillinger B, Woker R, et al. Survey to estimate the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in hospital patients in Germany by systematic HbA1c measurement upon admission. Int J Clin Pract 2018;72:e13273.
  22. Sánchez-González CM, Castillo-Mora A, Alvarado-Maldonado IN, Ortega-González C, Martínez-Cruz N, Arce-Sánchez L, et al. Reference intervals for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in healthy Mexican pregnant women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:424.
  23. Wang Y, Peng W, Tang J, Dong L, Gu C, Zhang X, et al. Verification of a novel point-of-care HbA1c device in real world clinical practice by comparison to three high performance liquid chromatography instruments. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2018;28:020705.