Performance Evaluation of the PowerChek SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A & B Multiplex Real-Time PCR Kit in Comparison with the BioFire Respiratory Panel
2022; 42(4): 473-477
Ann Lab Med 2020; 40(2): 169-173
Published online March 1, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2020.40.2.169
Copyright © Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine.
Sunghwan Shin , M.D.1,*, In Young Yoo
, M.D., Ph.D.1,*, Hyang Jin Shim
, M.T.2, On Kyun Kang
, M.T.1, Byung Woo Jhun
, M.D., Ph.D.3, Won-Jung Koh
, M.D., Ph.D.3, Hee Jae Huh
, M.D., Ph.D.1, and Nam Yong Lee, M.D., Ph.D.1
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, 2Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, and 3Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to: Hee Jae Huh, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3410-1836 Fax: +82-2-3410-2719 E-mail: pmhhj77@gmail.com
Nam Yong Lee, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3410-2706 Fax: +82-2-3410-2719 E-mail: micro.lee@samsung.com
* These authors equally contributed to this study.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The GENEDIA MTB/NTM Detection Kit (GENEDIA MTB/NTM; Green Cross Medical Science Corp., Chungbuk, Korea) is a multiplex real-time PCR assay used for differential identification of
Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, Nontuberculous mycobacteria, Performance, Detection, Real-time PCR, Mycobacterial culture
Tuberculosis (TB), caused by members of the
Detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) by microscopic examination is a rapid and inexpensive method for TB diagnosis; however, this approach does not differentiate between MTBC and NTM, which requires an additional phenotypic identification step using biochemical assays that are time-consuming and labor intensive [6,7]. To overcome these disadvantages, various molecular diagnostic assays for differential identification of MTBC and NTM have been developed and evaluated [8,9,10,11,12].
The GENEDIA MTB/NTM Detection Kit (GENEDIA MTB/NTM; Green Cross Medical Science Corp., Chungbuk, Korea) is a multiplex real-time PCR assay used for differential identification of MTBC and NTM. This assay targets the IS
We used a total of 687 non-selective, consecutive sputum specimens submitted for AFB smear and mycobacterial culture between January and March 2018. This prospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea (approval number 2018-04-015). All submitted clinical specimens were decontaminated with the same volume of 2% N-acetyl-l-cysteine-sodium hydroxide and then centrifuged at 3,000 ×
To extract DNA, 100 µL of decontaminated sputum specimens were suspended in 100 µL of DNA extraction buffer, and the mixtures were boiled for 10 minutes. After centrifugation, the supernatants were used for both GENEDIA MTB/NTM and GENEDIA MTB assays, which were conducted in parallel, according to the manufacturer's instructions. For the two GENEDIA assays, positive and negative controls were included in each run, and an internal control was used throughout the assay to detect PCR inhibitors. PCR amplification was conducted with a 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Positive MTBC and NTM results of GENEDIA MTB/NTM were determined when the cycle threshold (Ct) value was less than 40 and 35, respectively. The same Ct value of 40 was used for the MTBC detection using GENEDIA MTB.
The detection limit of the GENEDIA MTB/NTM was measured using serial dilutions of DNA extracted from the reference strains (MTB,
Patient information was reviewed in NTM-positive patients to determine the association between the NTM PCR results and NTM-PD. The ATS/Infectious Diseases Society of America diagnostic criteria for NTM disease were applied to patients from whom NTM species were isolated [16].
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of each assay stratified by AFB smear status was calculated based on the results of the reference methods. Kappa value was calculated to compare the agreement between GENEDIA MTB/NTM and GENEDIA MTB for the detection of MTBC. A Chi-square test was used to determine the association between the NTM PCR results and NTM-PD. Statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc Statistical Software version 19.0.5 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium) and the VassarStats website (http://vassarstats.net/).
Of the 687 specimens, 12 were positive for MTBC using both the GENEDIA MTB/NTM and GENEDIA MTB assays, with a kappa value of 1.00. Nineteen (2.8%) and 69 (10.0%) specimens were positive for MTBC and NTM by mycobacterial culture, respectively (Table 1). Seven of the 19 MTBC culture-positive specimens (36.8%) were smear-positive, while the remaining 12 (63.2%) were smear-negative. For the 69 NTM culture-positive specimens, 14 (20.3%) were smear-positive and 55 (79.7%) were smear-negative. Of these culture-positive specimens, 16 were NTM-positive based on the GENEDIA MTB/NTM, while of the 618 NTM culture-negative specimens, two were NTM-positive.
The sensitivities and specificities of the GENEDIA MTB/NTM and GENEDIA MTB assays based on the concurrent culture results with smear status are shown in Table 2. GENEDIA MTB/NTM and GENEDIA MTB exhibited the same overall performance for MTBC detection from direct sputum specimens. For NTM detection using GENEDIA MTB/NTM, the sensitivity was 85.7% for smear-positive specimens and 7.3% for smear-negative specimens. The PPVs and NPVs for detecting MTBC and NTM are further described in Table 2, since the population in this study reflects the true disease prevalence in our hospital. Of the 69 NTM culture-positive specimens, 16 were NTM-positive by GENEDIA MTB/NTM, and 62.5% (10/16) were specimens obtained from patients with NTM-PD. The remaining 53 specimens were NTM-negative by GENEDIA MTB/NTM, and 49.1% (26/53) specimens were obtained from patients with NTM-PD. However, the association between NTM PCR-positive results and NTM-PD was not statistically significant (
The detection limit of GENEDIA MTB/NTM for MTB detection was 5.0×10−6 ng/µL (equal to 1 copy/µL). The measured limits for
The overall MTBC sensitivity using GENEDIA MTB/NTM was identical to that of the GENEDIA MTB, and all the smear-positive MTBC were detected by both GENEDIA MTB/NTM and GENEDIA MTB. However, smear-negative MTBC specimens showed lower sensitivities with both methods (41.7%), as reported previously in various real-time PCR assays [13,17]. While GENEDIA MTB/NTM detected the vast majority of NTM in smear-positive specimens, NTM sensitivity with smear-negative specimens was <10%. Because differentiation between MTB and NTM is important for smear-negative specimens when mycobacterial infection is suspected, insufficient detection of NTM is a limiting factor for clinical use.
The analytical sensitivity of
Recently, Kim, et al. [18] suggested that an NTM directly isolated from respiratory specimens by real-time PCR assay is a causative organism of true NTM disease. In their study, the vast majority of PCR-positive NTM specimens were obtained from patients with NTM disease. However, our data revealed no significant difference in NTM-PD between the PCR-positive and PCR-negative groups. Further studies are required to confirm the validity of these findings.
This study had some limitations. First, few MTBC culture-positive specimens were included owing to the relatively low number of TB patients enrolled. Second, as only sputum specimens were evaluated, further studies with various types of specimens are required to more broadly evaluate the GENEDIA MTB/NTM assay for differentiation between MTBC and NTM.
In conclusion, our data indicate that the GENEDIA MTB/NTM and the GENEDIA MTB assays have similar clinical performance for detecting MTBC from direct sputum specimens. However, the GENEDIA MTB/NTM assay showed significantly lower sensitivity for NTM detection than for MTBC detection, especially for smear-negative specimens.