Biomarkers in Heart Failure: From Research to Clinical Practice
Alexander E. Berezin , M.D., Ph.D. and Alexander A. Berezin , M.D.
Ann Lab Med 2023; 43(3): 225-236Review Article l 01 September 2024
Xincen Duan, Ph.D., Minglong Zhang et al.
Ann Lab Med 2024; 44: 385-391Keywords: Artificial intelligence, Machine learning, Patient-based real-time QC, QC
Review Article l 01 July 2024
In Hwa Jeong, M.D., SooHo Yu et al.
Ann Lab Med 2024; 44: 307-313Keywords: Asian-type DEL, Pregnant women, Rho(D) immune globulin, Weak D
Review Article l 01 July 2024
Na Kyung Lee, Ph.D. and Jong Wook Chang, Ph.D.
Ann Lab Med 2024; 44: 314-323Keywords: Cell therapy, Chimeric antigen receptor T, Clinical translation, Gene therapy, Manufacturing, Mesenchymal stem cells, Viral vectors
Review Article l 01 May 2024
Seok Jin Kim, M.D., Ph.D. et al.
Ann Lab Med 2024; 44: 210-221Keywords: Chimeric antigen receptor, Cytokine toxicity, Efficacy, Lymphoma, Multiple myeloma
Review Article l 01 March 2024
Samuel Vasikaran, M.D., Subashini C. Thambiah et al.
Ann Lab Med 2024; 44: 126-134Keywords: Bisphosphonate, Bone fracture, Bone-turnover marker, Monitoring, Osteoporosis, Reference interval, Renal osteodystrophy, Risk, Standardization, Treatment
Review Article l 01 March 2024
Hans Pottel, Ph.D., Pierre Delanaye et al.
Ann Lab Med 2024; 44: 135-143Keywords: Creatinine, Cystatin C, Estimated glomerular filtration rate, Kidney
Review Article l 01 January 2024
Abdurrahman Coskun, M.D.
Ann Lab Med 2024; 44: 6-20Keywords: Bias, Confidence interval, Diagnostic error, Quality control, Total quality management, Uncertainty
Review Article2023-05-01 Clinical Chemistry
Alexander E. Berezin , M.D., Ph.D. and Alexander A. Berezin , M.D.
Ann Lab Med 2023; 43(3): 225-236Abstract : The aim of this narrative review is to summarize contemporary evidence on the use of circulating cardiac biomarkers of heart failure (HF) and to identify a promising biomarker model for clinical use in personalized point-of-care HF management. We discuss the reported biomarkers of HF classified into clusters, including myocardial stretch and biomechanical stress; cardiac myocyte injury; systemic, adipocyte tissue, and microvascular inflammation; cardiac fibrosis and matrix remodeling; neurohumoral activation and oxidative stress; impaired endothelial function and integrity; and renal and skeletal muscle dysfunction. We focus on the benefits and drawbacks of biomarker-guided assistance in daily clinical management of patients with HF. In addition, we provide clear information on the role of alternative biomarkers and future directions with the aim of improving the predictive ability and reproducibility of multiple biomarker models and advancing genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic evaluations.
Review Article2023-01-01 Clinical Chemistry
Wan Ling Cheng , M.Sc., Corey Markus , M.Sc., Chun Yee Lim , Ph.D., Rui Zhen Tan , Ph.D., Sunil Kumar Sethi , MBBS., and Tze Ping Loh , MB.BCh.BAO.; for the IFCC Working Group on Method Evaluation Protocols
Ann Lab Med 2023; 43(1): 5-18Abstract : Background: Calibration is a critical component for the reliability, accuracy, and precision of mass spectrometry measurements. Optimal practice in the construction, evaluation, and implementation of a new calibration curve is often underappreciated. This systematic review examined how calibration practices are applied to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry measurement procedures. Methods: The electronic database PubMed was searched from the date of database inception to April 1, 2022. The search terms used were “calibration,” “mass spectrometry,” and “regression.” Twenty-one articles were identified and included in this review, following evaluation of the titles, abstracts, full text, and reference lists of the search results. Results: The use of matrix-matched calibrators and stable isotope-labeled internal standards helps to mitigate the impact of matrix effects. A higher number of calibration standards or replicate measurements improves the mapping of the detector response and hence the accuracy and precision of the regression model. Constructing a calibration curve with each analytical batch recharacterizes the instrument detector but does not reduce the actual variability. The analytical response and measurand concentrations should be considered when constructing a calibration curve, along with subsequent use of quality controls to confirm assay performance. It is important to assess the linearity of the calibration curve by using actual experimental data and appropriate statistics. The heteroscedasticity of the calibration data should be investigated, and appropriate weighting should be applied during regression modeling. Conclusions: This review provides an outline and guidance for optimal calibration practices in clinical mass spectrometry laboratories.
Review Article2024-01-01 Clinical Chemistry
Abstract : Physicians increasingly use laboratory-produced information for disease diagnosis, patient monitoring, treatment planning, and evaluations of treatment effectiveness. Bias is the systematic deviation of laboratory test results from the actual value, which can cause misdiagnosis or misestimation of disease prognosis and increase healthcare costs. Properly estimating and treating bias can help to reduce laboratory errors, improve patient safety, and considerably reduce healthcare costs. A bias that is statistically and medically significant should be eliminated or corrected. In this review, the theoretical aspects of bias based on metrological, statistical, laboratory, and biological variation principles are discussed. These principles are then applied to laboratory and diagnostic medicine for practical use from clinical perspectives.
Review Article2024-03-01 Clinical Chemistry
Hans Pottel , Ph.D., Pierre Delanaye , M.D., Ph.D., and Etienne Cavalier , Ph.D.
Ann Lab Med 2024; 44(2): 135-143Abstract : Serum creatinine and serum cystatin C are the most widely used renal biomarkers for calculating the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which is used to estimate the severity of kidney damage. In this review, we present the basic characteristics of these biomarkers, their advantages and disadvantages, some basic history, and current laboratory measurement practices with state-of-the-art methodology. Their clinical utility is described in terms of normal reference intervals, graphically presented with age-dependent reference intervals, and their use in eGFR equations.
Original Article2023-01-01 Clinical Microbiology
Gyu Ri Kim , Ph.D., Eun-Young Kim , Ph.D., Si Hyun Kim , Ph.D., Hae Kyung Lee , M.D., Jaehyeon Lee , M.D., Jong Hee Shin , M.D., Young Ree Kim , M.D., Sae Am Song , M.D., Joseph Jeong , M.D., Young Uh , M.D., Yu Kyung Kim , M.D., Dongeun Yong , M.D., Hyun Soo Kim , M.D., Sunjoo Kim , M.D., Young Ah Kim , M.D., Kyeong Seob Shin , M.D., Seok Hoon Jeong , M.D., Namhee Ryoo , M.D., and Jeong Hwan Shin , M.D.
Ann Lab Med 2023; 43(1): 45-54Abstract : Background: Streptococcus pneumoniae is a serious pathogen causing various infections in humans. We evaluated the serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance of S. pneumoniae causing invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) after introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV)13 in Korea and investigated the epidemiological characteristics of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates. Methods: S. pneumoniae isolates causing IPD were collected from 16 hospitals in Korea between 2017 and 2019. Serotyping was performed using modified sequential multiplex PCR and the Quellung reaction. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed using the broth microdilution method. Multilocus sequence typing was performed on MDR isolates for epidemiological investigations. Results: Among the 411 S. pneumoniae isolates analyzed, the most prevalent serotype was 3 (12.2%), followed by 10A (9.5%), 34 (7.3%), 19A (6.8%), 23A (6.3%), 22F (6.1%), 35B (5.8%), 11A (5.1%), and others (40.9%). The coverage rates of PCV7, PCV10, PCV13, and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV)23 were 7.8%, 7.8%, 28.7%, and 59.4%, respectively. Resistance rates to penicillin, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, and levofloxacin were 13.1%, 9.2%, 80.3%, and 4.1%, respectively. MDR isolates accounted for 23.4% of all isolates. Serotypes 23A, 11A, 19A, and 15B accounted for the highest proportions of total isolates at 18.8%, 16.7%, 14.6%, and 8.3%, respectively. Sequence type (ST)166 (43.8%) and ST320 (12.5%) were common among MDR isolates. Conclusions: Non-PCV13 serotypes are increasing among invasive S. pneumoniae strains causing IPD. Differences in antimicrobial resistance were found according to the specific serotype. Continuous monitoring of serotypes and antimicrobial resistance is necessary for the appropriate management of S. pneumoniae infections.
Review Article2024-03-01 Clinical Chemistry
Samuel Vasikaran , M.D., Subashini C. Thambiah , M.Path., Rui Zhen Tan , Ph.D., and Tze Ping Loh , M.B., B.ch., B.A.O.; APFCB Harmonization of Reference Interval Working Group
Ann Lab Med 2024; 44(2): 126-134Abstract : Bone-turnover marker (BTM) measurements in the blood or urine reflect the bone-remodeling rate and may be useful for studying and clinically managing metabolic bone diseases. Substantial evidence supporting the diagnostic use of BTMs has accumulated in recent years, together with the publication of several guidelines. Most clinical trials and observational and reference-interval studies have been performed in the Northern Hemisphere and have mainly involved Caucasian populations. This review focuses on the available data for populations from the Asia-Pacific region and offers guidance for using BTMs as diagnostic biomarkers in these populations. The procollagen I N-terminal propeptide and β-isomerized C-terminal telopeptide of type-I collagen (measured in plasma) are reference BTMs used for investigating osteoporosis in clinical settings. Premenopausal reference intervals (established for use with Asia-Pacific populations) and reference change values and treatment targets (used to monitor osteoporosis treatment) help guide the management of osteoporosis. Measuring BTMs that are not affected by renal failure, such as the bone-specific isoenzyme alkaline phosphatase and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b, may be advantageous for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Further studies of the use of BTMs in individuals with metabolic bone disease, coupled with the harmonization of commercial assays to provide equivalent results, will further enhance their clinical applications.
Original Article2022-03-01 Clinical Chemistry
Hyun Suk Yang , M.D., Ph.D., Mina Hur , M.D., Ph.D., Kyeong Ryong Lee , M.D., Ph.D., Hanah Kim , M.D., Ph.D., Hahn Young Kim , M.D., Ph.D., Jong Won Kim , M.D., Ph.D., Mui Teng Chua , M.D., Win Sen Kuan , M.D., Horng Ruey Chua , M.D., Chagriya Kitiyakara , M.D., Phatthranit Phattharapornjaroen , M.D., Anchalee Chittamma , Ph.D., Thiyapha Werayachankul , M.Sc., Urmila Anandh , M.D., Sanjeeva Herath , M.B., Ch.B., Zoltan Endre , M.D., Ph.D., Andrea Rita Horvath , M.D., Ph.D., Paola Antonini , M.D., and Salvatore Di Somma , M.D., Ph.D. on behalf of the GREAT Network
Ann Lab Med 2022; 42(2): 178-187Abstract : Background: Urine tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2/insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (TIMP-2/IGFBP7) (NephroCheck, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ, USA) is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved biomarker for risk assessment of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill adult patients in intensive care units; however, its clinical impact in the emergency department (ED) remains unproven. We evaluated the utility of NephroCheck for predicting AKI development and short-term mortality in the ED. Methods: This was a prospective, observational, five-center international study. We consecutively enrolled ED patients admitted with ≥30% risk of AKI development (assessed by ED physician: ED score) or acute diseases. Serum creatinine was tested on ED arrival (T0), day 1, and day 2 (T48); urine for NephroCheck was collected at T0 and T48. We performed ROC curve and reclassification analyses. Results: Among the 529 patients enrolled (213 females; median age, 65 years), AKI developed in 59 (11.2%) patients. The T0 NephroCheck value was higher in the AKI group than in the non-AKI group (median 0.77 vs. 0.29 (ng/m)2/1,000, P=0.001), and better predicted AKI development than the ED score (area under the curve [AUC], 0.64 vs. 0.53; P=0.04). In reclassification analyses, adding NephroCheck to the ED score improved the prediction of AKI development (P
Original Article2022-03-01 Diagnostic Immunology
Mina Hur , M.D., Ph.D., Mikyoung Park , M.D., Ph.D., Hee-Won Moon , M.D., Ph.D., Won Hyeok Choe , M.D., Ph.D., and Chae Hoon Lee , M.D., Ph.D.
Ann Lab Med 2022; 42(2): 249-257Abstract : Background: Non-invasive clinical algorithms for the detection of liver fibrosis (LF) can reduce the need for liver biopsy (LB). We explored the implementation of two serum biomarkers, enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) and Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi), in clinical algorithms for LF in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Methods: Two clinical algorithms were applied to 152 CHB patients: (1) transient elastography (TE) followed by biomarkers (TE/ELF and TE/M2GPGi); (2) biomarker test followed by TE (ELF/TE and M2BPGi/TE). Using the cut-off value or index for the detection of advanced LF (TE≥F3; 9.8 in ELF and 3.0 in M2BPGi), LB was expected to be performed in cases with discordant TE and biomarker results. Results: In both algorithms, the expected number of LBs was lower when using M2BPGi than when using ELF (TE/ELF or ELF/TE, 13.2% [N=20]; TE/M2BPGi or M2BPGi/TE, 9.9% [N=15]), although there was no statistical difference (P=0.398). In the TE low-risk group (TE≤F2), the discordance rate was significantly lower in the TE/M2BPGi approach than in the TE/ELF approach (1.5% [2/136] vs. 11.0% [15/136], P=0.002). In the biomarker low-risk group, there was no significant difference between the ELF/TE and M2BPGi/TE approaches (3.9% [5/126] vs. 8.8% [13/147], P=0.118). Conclusions: Both ELF and M2BPGi can be implemented in non-invasive clinical algorithms for assessing LF in CHB patients. Given the lowest possibility of losing advanced LF cases in the low-risk group when using the TE/M2BPGi approach, this combination seems useful in clinical practice.
Original Article2022-01-01 Diagnostic Immunology
Sumi Yoon , M.D., Hee-Won Moon , M.D., Ph.D., Hanah Kim , M.D., Ph.D., Mina Hur , M.D., Ph.D., and Yeo-Min Yun , M.D., Ph.D.
Ann Lab Med 2022; 42(1): 63-70Abstract : Background: Recently, two fully automated immunoassays for antinuclear antibody (ANA) screening were introduced: EliA CTD Screen (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Freiburg, Germany) and QUANTA Flash CTD Screen Plus (Inova Diagnostics, San Diego, USA). We evaluated their clinical performance in comparison with the indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) and analyzed samples with discrepant results. Methods: In total, 406 serum samples (206 from patients undergoing routine checkups and 200 from rheumatology clinic patients) were assayed using EliA, QUANTA Flash, and IIFA. We evaluated assay concordance and agreement and confirmed the presence of anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) antibodies in samples with discrepant automated immunoassay and IIFA results. Additionally, we compared the clinical performance of each assay in diagnosing ANA-associated rheumatic disease (AARD) and adjusted the cut-off values. Results: In rheumatology clinic samples, the concordance and agreement were 91.5% and strong between EliA and QUANTA Flash, 79.0% and weak between EliA and IIFA, and 80.5% and moderate between QUANTA Flash and IIFA, respectively. In automated immunoassay-positive, IIFA-negative samples (N=15), all anti-ENA antibodies detected (6/15) were anti-Sjögren’s syndrome antigen A/Ro (Ro60) antibodies. The automated immunoassays and IIFA showed high accuracy for diagnosing AARD, and adjusted cut-off values improved their sensitivities (EliA with 0.56 ratio, 82.9% sensitivity; QUANTA Flash with 9.7 chemiluminescent units, 87.8% sensitivity). Conclusions: The two automated immunoassays showed reliable performance compared with IIFA and can be efficiently used with the IIFA in clinical immunology laboratories. Clinical cut-off values can be adjusted according to the workflow in each laboratory.